Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

H*yas for Choice Petitions GU To Condemn OCC Speakers, Change Name

Over 600 Georgetown University community members have signed a petition circulated by pro-abortion rights student group H*yas for Choice in anticipation of the 22nd Cardinal O’Connor Conference on Life.

The OCC, which is scheduled to be held virtually Jan. 30, was founded by Georgetown students in 2000 and is the largest student-run anti-abortion conference in the United States. The conference’s namesake, Cardinal John J. O’Connor (GRD ’70), was an archbishop of New York who took a strong anti-abortion position while promoting homophobic views and policies, according to the petition.

The petition is the latest development in student advocacy against the conference and asks the university to publish a communitywide email by Jan. 29 condemning Cardinal O’Connor’s actions and the racist, misogynistic, homophobic and transphobic rhetoric of the speakers and panelists. The petition also asks the university to require student organizers to change the conference name by December 2021. 

RYAN BAE/THE HOYA | Over 600 Georgetown University community members have signed a petition circulated by H*yas for Choice in anticipation of the 22nd Cardinal O’Connor Conference on Life.

Georgetown should not endorse the discriminatory views and ideas the conference promotes, according to the petition.

“Year after year, this conference glorifies Cardinal O’Connor – an infamous homophobe and misogynist – and provides a platform for extremely racist, sexist, anti-LGBTQ speakers to indoctrinate hundreds of impressionable teenagers with their hateful ideologies,” the petition reads. “The fact that Georgetown continues to host COCC demonstrates its lack of regard for marginalized students and their interests.”

Aimee Murphy, the founder of Rehumanize International, an organization against all violence, is the conference’s keynote speaker. Other panelists include Reggie Littlejohn, Valerie Huber, Alveda King and Sister Dede Byrne (MED ’84), all advocates in the anti-abortion movement.

Panelists have promoted anti-LGBTQ and anti-abortion beliefs in their advocacy work, according to the petition.

Huber, who was appointed by former President Trump to serve in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office, has promoted abstinence-only sex education programs and argued teaching about consent and sexual assault preventation encourages tennage sexual behavior. 

In 2015, King, who is Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece and currently serves on the pastoral team of Priests for Life, opposed legalizing same-sex marriage in Georgia, and in 2010, she compared same-sex marriage to genocide in a speech to the National Organization for Marriage.

The petition chiefly focuses on the conference’s speakers and namesake as they threaten the well-being of the student body and conference attendees, according to Lauryn Ping (COL ’23), a member of the HFC Advocacy Board and the primary author of the petition.

“We decided to focus on the problematic use of the speakers and the namesake, because I think those are the most pressing issues that we have with the conference,” Ping said in a Zoom interview with The Hoya. “Given our current political climate, I think it’s more important than ever to really reject homophobia and transphobia and racism outright.”

The OCC board maintains support of these panelists and finds their advocacy to be positive to the anti-abortion cause, according to OCC co-directors Luke Lamey (SFS ’21) and Joey Yacovone (COL ’22).

“Our speakers are leaders within the pro-life community and strong advocates for women and children,” Yacovone and Lamey wrote in an email to The Hoya. 

O’Connor was a vocal anti-abortion advocate who often reaffirmed the Catholic Church’s stance against the right to choose. Many Catholics have lauded the cardinal for his work defending organized labor, his advocacy for homeless people and his opposition to the death penalty in his pro-life advocacy. 

O’Connor also condemned a 1986 New York bill that would grant legal protection to the LGBTQ community and supported a ban on LGBTQ members from holding masses on the property of the Diocese of Brooklyn. 

Student run organizations can invite any speaker to campus, according to Georgetown’s speech and expression policy, a university spokesperson wrote in an email to The Hoya. 

“An appearance of any speaker or guest on campus is not an endorsement by Georgetown University,” the spokesperson wrote. “Georgetown is firmly committed to the Catholic Church’s teachings and values, including those about the sanctity and dignity of life, and we strongly support a climate that continues to provide students with new and deeper contexts for engaging with our Catholic tradition and Jesuit identity.”

Since its creation in 2000, the conference has garnered significant student criticism. In the past, students have protested outside the conference and shared fliers around campus in the days leading up to the event. 

The OCC’s student organizers, however, remain committed to the conference’s mission and core beliefs, according to Yacovone and Lamey.

“In his first year as archbishop of New York, Cardinal O’Connor made an offer that any woman in need should come to him for help rather than abort her child, recognizing the need to care for the dignity of both women and children,” they wrote. “The Cardinal centered women in his pro-life argument.” 

More than 30 Georgetown student organizations have signed in support of the petition, joining HFC’s condemnation of the conference, including the Georgetown University Student Association, Georgetown University College Democrats and the Georgetown University American Civil Liberties Union. 

The rhetoric of the OCC is harmful to many of Georgetown’s marginalized communities and should not be endorsed by the university, according to GUSA Press Secretary Jacob Bernard (SFS ’23).

“Georgetown University’s symbolic commitments to supporting equality and racial justice are not enough–we would like to see the University take meaningful action to support women and the LGTBQ+ community by supporting Hoyas for Choice initiatives, combatting homophobia, and investing in improved mental health services,” Bernard wrote in an email to The Hoya.

Until Georgetown denounces the speakers, platform and namesake of the conference, the administration is not fully supporting all students, Ping said.

“The conference also provides a platform for extremely racist, sexist, anti-LGBTQ+ speakers to basically indoctrinate hundreds of teenagers with their hateful ideologies, and I’m sure Georgetown has repeatedly proclaimed that it supports racial justice, gender equality and LGBT rights,” Ping said. “It’s active support of this conference, despite the problematic speakers and its namesake, that demonstrate that the university is falling woefully short of its espoused ideals.” 

This article has been updated to correct a quote.

View Comments (6)
Donate to The Hoya

Your donation will support the student journalists of Georgetown University. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
Donate to The Hoya

Comments (6)

All The Hoya Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • G

    GregFeb 4, 2021 at 12:56 am

    You wrote this in the newspaper’s voice. Please add quotes if this is what HFC wrote. As written, The Hoya is labeling conference speakers as “racist, misogynistic, homophobic and transphobic.”

    Reply
  • L

    Lou S.Jan 28, 2021 at 4:21 pm

    Interesting to witness the “open-mindedness” for allowing differing points of view.

    Reply
  • E

    ElizabethJan 27, 2021 at 11:57 pm

    To call the O’Connor Conference and its speakers “racist, misogynistic, homophobic and transphobic” is to severely misunderstand the true and immense gravity of these terms.

    The late Cardinal, and the OCC’s speakers, are none of these horrific things. He regularly volunteered at a Catholic hospital, tending to HIV/AIDS-infected LGBTQ patients at the height of the epidemic. In 1988, he condemned a spate of brutal beatings and stabbings perpetrated against LGBTQ individuals in New York; in fact, he was praised by an LGBTQ legal support group for his response. Rather than stunting or shunning women, he offered private counseling to those in need, offered his personal help to expectant mothers, and founded the Sisters of Life – nearly 100 women and counting who directly minister to post-abortive women.

    H*yas for Choice is fond of taking things out of context and using them to further their goal of shutting down a conference whose pro-life ethos is inherently anathema to the pro-choice movement. They argue that he was homophobic because he didn’t distribute condoms and that he “prevented homosexual Roman Catholics from holding masses.” Anyone remotely familiar with Catholicism should know that a Cardinal cannot – even if he wanted to – distribute condoms to *anyone* – it has absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality. They should also know that no Roman Catholics can unilaterally hold masses – a priest’s presence is required, and it is wrong for *anyone* to hold their own service.

    The O’Connor Conference does not discriminate against individuals of any race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, political affiliation, or religious denomination. Pro-life Hoyas diligently seek to invite students of all backgrounds to engage in the programming and welcome open discourage, including and especially regarding how it can be more inclusive.

    It is shameful to diminish the meaning and gravity of the derogatory terms used in this petition – racism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia – by tossing them blithely out, devoid of substance and replete with buzzwords and an astounding incomprehension of Catholic church teaching. The Hoya merely abets H*yas for Choice by routinely publishing one-sided articles such as this, refusing to dignify the substantial efforts made by pro-life Hoyas each year to bring light to the true nature of the OCC.

    Reply
    • E

      ElizabethJan 27, 2021 at 11:59 pm

      Hi, sorry, can you please change “discourage” to “discourse”?

      Reply
  • J

    Jane HoyaJan 27, 2021 at 9:07 pm

    Not surprised. Another piece of mediocre reporting done by The Hoya in a totally one-sided article.

    Reply
  • S

    SeniorJan 27, 2021 at 8:36 pm

    Genuine question–is there a general editorial policy to use the descriptor “anti-abortion” over “pro-life?” Would be interested to hear the thought process behind this.

    Reply