Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

HOCHBERG: Intimidation Game Threatens US Trade

Isabel Binamira China’s island building in the contested South China Sea includes a military base on the Fiery Cross Reef, claimed by three other countries.
China’s island building in the contested South China Sea includes a military base on the Fiery Cross Reef, claimed by three other countries.

A dark possibility lurks in the shadows of the United States and China’s mutually beneficial trade relationship. As China’s militarization of the South China Sea continues to create tension with the United States and its allies, including Japan and the Philippines, a potential showdown looms. The conflict is still in its early stages, but if the precarious relationship between the United States and China falters even slightly, the economies of both countries could change irreparably.

Several weeks ago, Chinese President Xi Jinping warned American officials to stay away from the islands China has been building and arming in an area of the South China Sea. U.S. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter publicly refused, asserting that China does not have sovereignty over the water. Now, the United States has plans to send several Navy warships to the zone in question, solely for the purpose of exercising its legal right to do so and flexing its military muscle.

The Economist predicts that America’s direct refusal to respect China’s orders will not lead to mass violence — for now. The resources and power of the U.S. Navy are absolutely unmatched, and Chinese officials would be extremely unwise to issue a specific threat.

However, the Chinese did tell us to stay out of their waters, and even though they left us little choice but to disobey, this conflict could affect the global economy. Even without regard to specific relations between the two countries, the South China Sea is an important economic location. The Council on Foreign Relations predicts that a clash in the region would detrimentally affect the $5 trillion worth of trade that travels through the South China Sea yearly.

Furthermore, the economic relationship between the two countries is at stake. China is our primary source of imports and our third-largest source of exports, according to the Library of Congress. In the past, many economists have accused China of undervaluing its currency in order to boost exports. This policy may have been a crucial factor in the development of the huge U.S. trade deficit within the last few decades.

If keeping the value of the Chinese renminbi low could affect the U.S. economy so strongly, actual naval conflict between the two nations could be catastrophic. Not only would both nations be funneling immense quantities of money into fighting one another, but also their codependent economies could fall into recession or worse if trade decreases greatly.

Fortunately, a war is unlikely to occur, at least for now, but China is putting considerable resources into bolstering its navy and militarizing the South China Sea. World trade and the Chinese/American relationship will likely not escape completely unscathed.

Consequently, the U.S. government should tread carefully in making policy decisions from this point on. In the longterm, the country can focus on diversifying trade options and forging connections with smaller nations. However, due to the largely free and open nature of U.S. trade, the government has relatively limited control over the countries with which its firms and consumers interact.

China has most of the power in this situation. Hopefully, it will realize that it has little to gain from picking fights with the world’s strongest navy. However, its increasing militarization of the South China Sea appears to be leading somewhere, and surrounding nations — Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam all lay claim to parts of the region — are concerned.

The oil and natural gas reserves in the South China Sea make it extremely valuable, so it makes sense that several countries are trying to claim it. However, if China tries to force other nations away, they will all have an incentive to band together with the United States against that aggression. China probably recognizes this factor and will hopefully end militarization when it sees that it is not scaring away its neighbors and the United States.

Overall, the continued openness of Chinese trade routes is crucial. If China goes to war with a nation that has invaded its claimed territory, world trade could decrease drastically. This result benefits no one and will decrease the size of many countries’ individual economies. Exchange and inflation rates would fluctuate unreliably, and the damage would increase irreparably. The devastating effects that could come from China’s recent militarization are limitless.

Gracie Hochberg is a sophomore in the College. By The Numbers appears every Friday.

View Comments (2)
More to Discover

Comments (2)

All The Hoya Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • M

    Mort YoungOct 23, 2015 at 9:26 am

    (See above comment)

  • M

    Mort YoungOct 23, 2015 at 9:23 am

    Not only is the South China Sea a much-used trade route for more than the several local nations surrounding that area: it is among the most beautiful places on earth.
    The sea is dappled by colorful, tiny islands and local small fishing boats that appear at the first stroke of sunrise. I have never forgotten the beauty of the South China Sea after first seeing it while aboard an army ship delivering American troops from Japan to South Korea 60 years ago, as we rode the waves toward the rising sun.
    Yes, of course the sea is a valuable economic path for the surrounding countries and the vessels carrying goods in and away through the South Sea. But its beauty at dawn as the sun slowly rises and the sky is filled with changing colors and a caressing breeze: to think of war there is, well, almost unthinkable, be it for commerce or nature’s artistry.