Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Justice Ginsburg Denounces Unconscious Gender Bias

JESUS RODRIGUEZ/THE HOYA Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke about her life experiences and perspective on gender equality on Thursday.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke about her life experiences and perspective on gender equality on Thursday.

The law should not prevent women from pursuing their aspirations, said Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg during a discussion in Gaston Hall yesterday.

Society’s perception of women has evolved but certain underlying challenges remain toward achieving full gender equity, Ginsburg said.

“The challenge is more daunting than the one we faced. I spoke before about explicit gender-biased laws. What’s left, is what’s called unconscious bias. My best illustration of that is the symphony orchestra when I grew up you never saw a woman in the orchestra. The music critics thought that a violin sounded different played by a woman,” Ginsburg said. “It’s getting over that unconscious bias that remains a problem.”

Ginsburg was joined by her two authorized biographers, adjunct professor of law Mary Hartnett and Georgetown University Law Center professor Emerita Wendy Williams, to discuss her new book “My Own Words” as part of the Marver H. Bernstein Symposium, which seeks to stimulate discussion on public policy issues. Ginsburg also addressed GULC students Sept. 8 last year.

Ginsburg recommended women seek allies of all genders in an effort to fight gender discrimination.

“For you, the challenge is more daunting than the one that we faced,” Ginsburg said at Georgetown on Thursday. “My advice is find allies among men as well as women who want to change things. And think of yourself … as a teacher. So don’t react in anger because that’s going to be counter-productive.”

According to Ginsburg, when she joined the Supreme Court, gender-based discrimination was not considered an issue.

“There was the woman who took care of the home and children and the man who took care of the family’s economic wellbeing. And many laws were written with that picture of the world in mind,” Ginsburg said. “So the effort was to say there’s something wrong with that picture of the world. The object was to break down all those explicit gender-based distinctions so people could be free to be you and me.”

Ginsburg, who has served more than two decades on the Supreme Court, said she believes in the power of the law to evolve as times change.

“The great thing about our constitution is that, like our society, it can evolve,” Ginsburg said.

Currently, Ginsburg is one of three women on the Supreme Court. In 1993, when she was sworn in, she was the second female justice to be confirmed, joining former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who resigned from the court in 2006.

Ginsburg said O’Connor’s departure from the court led to the most significant shift in the Supreme Court in her time on the bench.

“The biggest change in the 24 years I’ve been there is when Justice O’Connor retired. Before, there were the two of us. We didn’t talk alike, we didn’t walk alike,” Ginsburg said. “But when Justice O’Connor left, there were these eight, most of them rather wealthy, men, and then this small little woman.”

Ginsburg said her husband Martin Ginsburg, a former GULC professor, was her biggest supporter and showed her what a partnership could look like. Ginsburg often referred to her Martin Ginsburg as a life partner, rather than husband.

“Marty was the first boy, probably the only boy, who cared that I had a brain,” Ginsburg said.

While Ginsburg’s “dissent jabot” has gained her a reputation as an avid dissenter, according to legal scholars, she said she aims to exercise that right only when necessary.

“I do not take every opportunity to dissent. I do try to save them for when it counts, when it really matters,” Ginsburg said. “I keep on my desk the unpublished opinions of Justice Brandeis. His view was his voice would be all the more compelling if he only dissented when it really mattered.”

Ginsburg hopes her work helps improve individuals’ state of living and ultimately contributes to a better world.

“I would like to be thought of as a person who cares about people and does the best she can with the talents she has to make a contribution to a better world,” Ginsburg said.

The Honorable Robert A. Katzmann, chief judge for the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals, who moderated the discussion, said Ginsburg has made enormous contributions to American society.

“Justice Ginsburg is celebrated for her impact as a judge on this country’s highest court, the second-longest member on the court, for her path marking contributions to laws’ developments, for her methodical, brilliant analyses and concise, elegant prose,” Katzmann said.

View Comments (5)
More to Discover

Comments (5)

All The Hoya Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • B

    Bill A.May 14, 2017 at 4:43 pm

    Gender Bias

    “When will there be enough women on the court? And my answer is when there are nine.”
    -‘Justice’ Ginsburg

    “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
    -‘Justice’ Sotomayor

  • D

    D. CrowMay 2, 2017 at 10:39 pm

    “The great thing about our constitution is that, like our society, it can evolve,”

    Hey, GInsburg, do you THINK (if you actually do that versus just espouse your political beliefs) that the Founding Fathers would have put in language about how the Constitution would evolve over time versus just assuming it would. You are pathetic (to put it nicely). Way to pee on the foundations of our country….

  • D

    D. CrowMay 2, 2017 at 10:34 pm

    Oh my goodness: a Supreme Court member with a history of political bias – versus the law itself – makes a call to arms for addressing bias. Perhaps she should take a good look in the mirror and realize that she and her professor husband are nothing more than hacks and sail quietly into the sunset. What a disgrace of a Supreme Court Justice. SHAME!!!!

  • M

    Mike FlynnApr 28, 2017 at 7:12 pm

    Unconscious gender bias? What does that mean? So we are to believe she knows what is in the subconscious of men who then unconsciously discriminate against women? So much unconscious male bias must have occurred against her that she became a Supreme Court Justice? Men in general do have bias for and against women just as many women tend to prejudge men. Men and women are different both physically and mentally. Both have strengths and weaknesses. Judge people on who they are and what they do not some belief that men are against women’s achievements.