Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

‘Dune’ Shoots for the Stars, Misses With Confusing Plot, Flat Acting

%E2%80%98Dune%E2%80%99+Shoots+for+the+Stars%2C+Misses+With+Confusing+Plot%2C+Flat+Acting

★★★☆☆

“Dune,” directed by Denis Villeneuve and starring Timothée Chalamet and Zendaya, includes many plot points that would traditionally be classified as cliche. 

The plot of the film is firmly based on the 1965 book of the same title written by Frank Herbert, and revolves around the Atreides family’s quest to win a war on the fictional planet Arrakis, the only source of life-extending material known as “spice.” The director and screenwriters deserve praise for maintaining such commitment to the original inspiration of the film, and because of this literary tie, any critique made of the movie must be based on this new film rendition. 

It would be easy to mistake the opening scenes of “Dune” for something out of the “Star Wars” franchise. The resemblance of the film’s powerful family line, House Atreides, to Darth Vader’s Empire, including the clan’s clothing, family dynamics and home environment, is uncanny. Additionally, the planet Arrakis parallels Tatooine from the Star Wars franchise in its desert-like climate. 

These similarities are easily explained, as George Lucas was greatly influenced by Herbert’s “Dune” when creating his famous saga. However, to avoid such obvious comparisons, Villenueve should have devoted more time to creating his own trademark set design and imagery, especially considering this is only the first installment in what will become a franchise. 

In spite of these resemblances to “Star Wars,” “Dune” does an amazing job at introducing the religious piety of the fictional and constantly persecuted human Fremen dwellers on Arrakis, which greatly mimics that of major modern organized religions. The parallels drawn between the film’s Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson) and the Virgin Mary, and between Paul (Chalamet) and Jesus provide the viewer with an opportunity to experience the movie from a religious and symbolic perspective that seeks to convey deeper meanings through the fantasy world of “Dune.” 

One of the highly anticipated aspects of “Dune” has been its stellar cast, including stars such as Chalamet, Ferguson and Stellan Skarsgård. While the trailer promotes Zendaya as a central character in the film, the well-known actress has very little screen time. 

Despite strong performances from Chalamet and Zendaya, a few actors fail to meet the high expectations of audiences. Oscar Isaac, who plays Duke Leto Atreides, fails to demonstrate to the viewer the deep relationship between his character and his son, Paul. For example, when the Duke tells his son he did not want to inherit the throne and instead wished to be a pilot, the scene, which is supposed to exhibit paternal love, is instead filled with indifference as a result of Isaac’s dry acting. 

One of the most successful aspects of “Dune” is the use of dreams as a plot device, like when Paul has a vision of Chani (Zendaya) in the deserts of Arrakis. Through Paul’s dreams, a sense of urgency is achieved in the film, as the dreams provide him with a glance into the future and create foreshadowing for the viewer. 

Along with the use of dreams to further the plot, music by Hans Zimmer and occasional silence are cleverly utilized to set the scene for the viewers, allowing them to feel pressure, suspense and excitement along with the characters. 

In spite of these strengths, the screenplay of “Dune” ultimately fails to portray the emotions mentioned above. The dialogue feels harsh at times, lacking any connection to the plot as a whole. Because of this, the storytelling can be construed as weak, and the narratives as confusing. If viewers have not read the book, they will struggle to find the connections between scenes.Due to the unimaginative storytelling and the long runtime at 155 minutes, “Dune” feels quite dense and repetitive, especially past its halfway point. What was supposed to be a critically acclaimed science fiction film ultimately flew too close to the sun.

View Comments (3)
More to Discover

Comments (3)

All The Hoya Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • J

    John LewisNov 8, 2022 at 2:00 pm

    Herbert’s writing is nothing short of superb and even his switching of character POV’s that irritated me so much in some of his unpublished work is deftly handled. The novel is interspersed with lore of the world or specific quotes, often directly linked to whatever you are about to read next and this sets up the world-building on a far grander scale than just what the individuals in front of you can see. Helpfully, all of the characters are so individual that you are never left in any doubt of whose point of view you are reading from at any given moment, and that alone is a mark of the strength of this novel. His characters come to life; all of them. All of them are flawed and imperfect and all of them felt utterly real, even Paul himself who could easily have become something of a superhero character. There are moments where his mother is so determined to focus the future down the path she has foreseen, that she stands in the way of what others believe is the right way of acting or an important decision. There is very real conflict between many of the characters when two strong individuals are placed in awkward disputes and conflicts. It is real.

    And Herbert’s imagination was immense. You can see that he has laid the groundwork for much of future science fiction in both literature and the screen. There is no need to go massively overboard with a whole ecological fount of strange creatures and lifeforms, instead Herbert has taken his desert world and created a simple yet superb display of life that is both utterly realistic and terrifying. The way he then moulds this into the ecological force of the planet itself is beyond clever and shows a foresight and understanding of ecology that is far beyond his time. In face, much of this novel is beyond his time. It doesn’t read like an old novel. It doesn’t read like a cliche, even though many of his ideas have been used in future narratives and stories. It reads like a fresh and vibrant piece that could have been a contemporary work.

    Reply
  • R

    RoyMar 12, 2022 at 12:25 pm

    Because the godfather is more grounded to reality which make it way easier to relate and understand from the real world. Can’t really compare a fictional mob crime to a big epic sci-fi with many key elements and factors. One movie isn’t enough to tell the whole dune lore.

    Reply
  • J

    johnJan 13, 2022 at 8:00 pm

    no one i know read The Godfather book before seeing the movie.
    the movie did what it was supposed to do. Dune didn’t.

    Reply