Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Georgetown University’s Newspaper of Record since 1920

The Hoya

Parent Facebook Group Goads University To Reopen in Spring, Attacks Community Compact

FILE PHOTO: ALEXANDER BROWN/THE HOYA | tk
FILE PHOTO: ALEXANDER BROWN/THE HOYA | tk

As the community awaits Georgetown University’s spring semester plans, a group of parents now call not only for students to live on campus this spring but also for Georgetown to cease enforcing its Community Compact, efforts that have been met with student criticism. 

FILE PHOTO: ALEXANDER BROWN/THE HOYA | Georgetown University community members have pushed back against calls for an on-campus spring semester from parents and students who argue the mental health benefits outweigh the physical health costs.

Since noise demanding the university reopen in the spring first appeared in the Class of 2024 parent Facebook group, over 600 parents and students have organized in a private Facebook group, “Students and Parents Advocating for Georgetown Students on Campus.” 

The group submitted a letter to administrators Sept. 21 and has since hosted a private meeting with administrators, met with the Citizens Association of Georgetown and published a petition addressed to university administrators and members of the board of directors, which has garnered over 1,500 signatures as of Nov. 5. 

By not allowing students to return to campus, the university creates disparities between students, sacrificing the mental health of some for the physical health of others, according to Palmina Fava (SFS ’94), whose son is a first-year student.

“If there is a disparity that is being created because we are mindful of a physical health risk while disregarding emotional health risk, it’s been important for me to say, well if we’re following the science, the science on how COVID affects the student population suggests to us that we should be open,” Fava said in an interview with The Hoya. 

Students have criticized the group’s efforts, however, with some posting their disapproval in the Facebook group. 

Jameson Nowlan (SFS ’23), a student currently living on campus, explained why she opposes rushing to reopen in the spring in an Oct. 26 Facebook post to the private group. Nowlan said she feels the mental strain just like everyone else but that protecting the lives of others is worth it.

“We cannot ignore the current public health situation. We are in the middle of a pandemic and while many students are perfectly healthy, we cannot forget about the hundreds of faculty, staff, and students that are either at-risk themselves, or live with immunocompromised family members,” Nowlan wrote in the post. “I am mentally and physically drained like everyone, but we have to work through it. I get we all need to cope, but if you feel okay with blindly slandering professors, other parents in the group, administration and even President DeGioia, you need to reevaluate.” 

Nowlan’s post has since been removed from the page by the group’s moderators.

The university reported 18 new cases of COVID-19 on or near campuses between Oct. 25 and Oct. 31. As of Nov. 5, more than 252,000 COVID-19 cases have emerged on more than 1,600 college campuses across the country, according to a New York Times database. The national case total now approaches 10 million, with over 230,000 deaths and counting.

Fava does not think anyone in the group is advocating for the university to overlook vulnerable members of the community, even though they are asking that the university take measures to bring students back to campus to protect the mental well-being of the rest of the student body.

“Let’s not elevate the health and well-being — the physical health and well-being — of a percentage of the population that we can put other controls in place to protect while we ignore the very real and serious consequences that are posed to the student body,” Fava said. “Let’s find a way to address both and keep both parts of people healthy, not just the physical, but the mental.”

The group has also started organizing efforts against the Community Compact. The compact sets limits on off-campus gatherings, asserts social distancing standards, delineates which parts of campus are accessible to students and outlines the consequences of violating any of the university’s rules.

Any student, faculty member or staff member wishing to access any university-owned property this fall was required to sign the compact. Students living off campus in the neighborhoods of Georgetown, Burleith and Foxhall were also required to sign the compact.

However, because students signed the compact on the condition that they would have access to campus, the compact should not be enforced for off-campus students who lack access to campus facilities, according to Fava, who is a lawyer.

“I find it draconian the way the university is trying to impose it and the penalties that it’s imposing on students who are found in violation of the COVID policies,” Fava said. “When Georgetown abdicates its responsibilities to fulfill its mission as an educational institution, and it doesn’t bring students back to campus, it doesn’t bring students back into the classroom, while knowing that those students are in the neighborhoods and are throughout D.C., then it is essentially saying ‘We don’t have responsibility for these kids. It’s the District’s problem.’”

Parents in the Facebook group whose students have been punished for violating the compact while living off campus have expressed frustration that Georgetown’s policies are stricter than the policies set forth by D.C., according to several posts in the group.

Nowlan understands that students are frustrated with following the university guidelines if they are not living directly on campus, but does not think the rules are too strict, considering the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“I don’t think the Community Compact is insane,” Nowlan said in an interview with The Hoya. “You just have to get tested like once a week, you’re not allowed to host gatherings of over 10 people, like a lot of things that I have no desire to do during a global pandemic.”

Parents should be advocating for their students and they have a right to the education they pay for, but many of the group’s efforts have gone beyond mere advocacy for what is best for their students, Nowlan said.

“I was asking everybody, including myself, to check our privilege during this time,” Nowlan said. “We’re all angry, I understand that. But we have to understand, in the middle of a global pandemic, how our own privilege operates and affects our efforts to want ourselves and our children back on campus.” 

Kate Clark (COL ’21) also expressed her opposition to the group’s efforts in an Oct. 28 Facebook post.

Clark, who currently lives in the Georgetown neighborhood, suffers from cystic fibrosis, a genetic lung disease. In her post, which was also removed by the group’s moderators, Clark explained that she is at high risk for COVID-19 because of her preexisting condition and is concerned that an influx of students to the campus and the neighborhood could put her in more danger. 

In response to her Facebook post, parents commented that Clark’s perspective was fundamentally different from their students’ issues, as Clark had an established connection with the school and was already living in D.C. away from her parents. 

Parents advocating for the university’s reopening believe they represent the interests of most students, so they were shocked to read that students did not agree with their advocacy, according to Manju Hariharan, whose daughter is a first-year student. 

“Some of the comments I was reading from the students on the page were like, ‘Oh, you’re such a privileged lot of parents,’” Hariharan said in an interview with The Hoya. “No, I just want my kid to have an experience. That’s it. And if anyone doesn’t want that experience, I’m not going to force you.”

Advocating for students to be on campus should not be a priority right now though, Clark said in an interview with The Hoya.

“It really just feels like they’re trying to get their kids on campus so that they can see other college kids, which is exactly what we’re trying to avoid right now,” Clark said. “None of us like this, but it’s not really about what we like right now. It’s about what we have to do to keep ourselves and each other safe.”

The negativity was unnecessary and the students’ arguments did not make much sense, according to Hariharan. 

“You’re living off campus, and you’re telling me that I can’t send my child there to be on campus where it’s going to be more controlled,” Hariharan said. “To me that didn’t make so much sense. It was like I get to do this, but I’m telling you you can’t do this.”

Despite pushback, there are some students who agree with the group’s advocacy. Some first-year students feel especially isolated from a campus they have yet to live on and hope for the opportunity to come to the Hilltop next semester, even if classes are mainly virtual, according to Kathy Gong (COL ’24). 

“Parents saw what their children went through for the fall, and I think if they’re speaking up now it indicates that students are generally dissatisfied with the virtual learning environment,” Gong wrote in an email to The Hoya. “To me, meeting with members of the university and forming petitions is a great way to ensure that the university is taking everyone’s opinions into account.” 

Gong plans to move to D.C. if not offered on-campus housing in the spring, with the hope that she will be more motivated to continue virtual classes nearby other Georgetown students, she said.

Katherine Cooper (SFS ’24), a student living off campus in the Georgetown neighborhood this semester and planning to do the same in the spring, said she understands the logic on either side. Although she is happy to be in D.C., it has been difficult to see many of her high school friends living on campus at other schools while she misses out on this experience, she said in an interview with The Hoya.

“This has been a really tough year for every college freshman from senior year and having prom, sports, graduation canceled and then starting off our freshman experience in college online,” Cooper said in an interview with The Hoya. “I can see a solid argument for either way, of opening or not opening.” 

The university has already confirmed that it will not be bringing all students to campus in the spring. However, it hopes to increase the number of students on campus from 500 to approximately 2,720 students, according to an Oct. 21 meeting between the Georgetown University Student Association and university administration.

Parents in the Facebook group have also referred to other D.C. universities, such as Catholic University and American University, which have both opened to students to some degree, to justify their perspective. Parents are arguing that if these schools can open, so can Georgetown, according to several Facebook posts.

George Washington University announced Oct. 9 that it would again conduct the spring semester entirely online to keep students and faculty safe from infection. Georgetown is currently set to release its spring plan by Nov. 16.

Nowlan said that activism should help those in danger and those most at risk of dying if they contract coronavirus, and she asked parents to consider whether their advocacy is misplaced.

“Why do you think it’s okay to say things like, ‘Students probably won’t die.’ Is it because your kid probably won’t die?” Nowlan said. “I am a generally healthy 19- almost 20-year-old. I’m probably not going to die of COVID if I get it. But that doesn’t mean I want all these students to come back because I know of immunocompromised students, I know of sick faculty who would really be deeply affected by this. When I was suggesting that people check their privilege, I was thinking, ‘How does your socioeconomic class, how does your race, how does your access to health care make the pandemic apply to you differently?’ and really consider that in your activism efforts to send people back to campus.” 

UPDATE: George Washington University announced it will be able to bring an additional 1,500 students back to campus this spring in an Oct. 22 update to its spring housing plan.

View Comments (13)
Donate to The Hoya

Your donation will support the student journalists of Georgetown University. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

More to Discover
Donate to The Hoya

Comments (13)

All The Hoya Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • S

    Sfs ‘22Nov 18, 2020 at 8:16 pm

    I am absolutely disheartened by the response of these parents. Georgetown students are guests in the D.C. community and it would have been entirely irresponsible to bring back additional students when the neighborhood is heavily elderly and the virus is disproportionately impacting Black and Latinx community members. I empathize with the mental health concerns as a fellow student, so I would actively encourage students to make use of the counseling resources the university is providing or ones within their communities. Nonetheless, “losing out on an experience” pales in comparison to someone losing their life. The administration’s plans reflect our school’s commitment, the one all student signed up for, to be men and women for others. For that, I am thankful to be a Hoya in these trying times.

    Reply
  • J

    Jack the BulldogNov 17, 2020 at 2:45 pm

    I’m curious what the Hoya and this parent facebook group have to say about that one app and the student who is hosting large parties around the DC area. But my guess is they think these events are acceptable college behaviours as well.

    Reply
  • J

    Jack DeHoyaNov 17, 2020 at 10:25 am

    Lol… these parent’s comments are something else. Sorry Karen and Chad… I’d love to see what these attack helicopter parents will say when we fully open the university and their precious Karen/Chad Jr catches COVID-19 and get seriously ill. I’m sure it’ll be a “it’s GU fault that they didn’t keep our children safe.”

    #clowns

    Reply
  • S

    sfs23Nov 14, 2020 at 3:47 am

    It is incredible how you can demonise kids who just want to spend their uni years on campus.

    Sure, there should be restrictions to ensure safety but this is not about the safety of the community. It is about how the university offloading liability for any potential cases. This is not a privileged group of children yapping to party on campus, what can be more natural than wanting a proper college experience especially when you have earned it through years of hard work and are paying for it

    Reply
  • M

    Max MoolNov 13, 2020 at 2:03 pm

    A group full of sociopaths

    Reply
  • 1

    1980sAlumNov 10, 2020 at 1:39 pm

    Over 80 percent of universities in the US have their students on campus and Georgetown’s lack of imagination and commitment is going to leave it behind. Almost every other Catholic university has students on campus
    Colleges sometimes shift to virtual when Covid level reach an unacceptable level, and any professor that feels they are at risk is allowed to teach away from campus, and schools test. It has been widely noted that Covid is not even in the top 10 of risks to college students, with things like drugs, depression and violence ranking much higher. This article is written as if it’s last April, ticking off a series of existential threats that don’t exist, and citing outlier cases. The student who is compromised living off campus doesn’t have to attend classes on campus if they don’t want to. Their condition shouldn’t shut down the campus for the 99.99% – and yes, that is the number – of 18-24 year olds for whom Covid causes no risk – and the almost equally high number of individuals under the age of 60 for whom it holds no risk. Draping yourself in fear is not the same as empathy and this is a classic case where the cure is worse than the disease – both to the students and to the University overall.

    Reply
  • A

    AAKNov 9, 2020 at 12:44 pm

    Bias much? Goad, really? Wow! How about interviewing upperclassmen who want the school to make efforts at opening for more than one side? Talk to some upperclassmen who aren’t living in Georgetown. And why so much focus on the neighborhood? Every school has populations in surrounding areas. Many city schools in densely populated cities like Fordham and Pitt are fully open to all. Did you do any work investigating how other schools have had success? And since when is it privilege to want what you are paying for? No one would push for a school to open if others around the country, in areas w higher covid numbers than DC, weren’t having success at it. Schools have had 7 months to make a plan and I would think that the great minds at Georgetown would be trailblazing this effort. I would also expect much better journalism from Georgetown student writers.

    Reply
  • G

    GU Alum and ParentNov 7, 2020 at 2:30 pm

    The “check your privilege” argument underscores the shallowness of the speaker’s mindset. Privilege is relative. Isn’t the student who lives near campus during this time “privileged” to be living semi-autonomously in Georgetown while other students are stuck back in their dull hometowns and high school bedrooms with parents and young siblings ever-present? Like another commenter said above, COVID is everywhere and is not going away. We have to learn to live our lives with it — safely, yes, but not in stasis. I’ve been very disappointed in how the university administration has handled this. Furthermore, I don’t really understand why 5,000 people need to organize their lives around one person with higher risk. To me, that speaks not just of privilege, but of a selfish “me first” attitude towards one’s fellow Hoyas.

    Reply
    • H

      Hoya Who Cares About OthersNov 10, 2020 at 10:56 pm

      If your comment is not a selfish “me first” attitude, I don’t know what is. You’d rather force the school to open up and let your kid live on campus than guarantee the well-being of the hundreds of at-risk students.

      Reply
  • C

    Cindy BambauerNov 6, 2020 at 10:02 pm

    Hmmm! I’m a parent of a sophomore transfer student whose dream it was to attend Georgetown. He was accepted this past spring and I cannot imagine a scenario where we would feel less welcome to a university community!

    Keep in mind I have three other college kids all living on their campuses and having very rich experiences.

    Georgetown can’t even try to do anything? Nothing? No big ideas? No problem solvers? No innovations? No plan? No communication? It’s unbelievable and so disappointing!

    We shall see what spring 2021 brings!

    Reply
  • C

    Carla BaroneNov 6, 2020 at 3:32 pm

    Acerbic, critical piece designed to further the authors’ social standing and virtue signaling at a time when parents and students are sincere and diligent in seeking a good faith solution to student anxiety with the partnership of the University. A shameful misuse of your “fact-gathering” platform.

    Reply
  • B

    BGNov 6, 2020 at 12:59 pm

    Your bias is showing! How about some journalistic integrity? Let’s start with the sensational headline and choice of negative words. “Goad”, really? Well I guess it would be like trying to get your parent’s attention when you want something and feel like they are being unresponsive. I guess your at attempts of getting their attention would be “goading” them right? There are at least 2 parties to every discussion, not every discussion needs to have one side portrayed as a villain.

    Reply
  • A

    A L HendersonNov 6, 2020 at 12:13 pm

    I have had compassion for every Georgetown student who wants to be on campus and is “missing out” on their college experience. The lack of compassion for the freshman and their families is upsetting. The title of the is article alone makes me feel like I’m being scrutinized for wanting my voice to be heard. People on the FaceBook 2024 group were asked to comment for the article to have their voices heard in response to the last article making us look like entitled villains. This article’s tone did not seem in favor of the FB group but instead seems like another attack. To be clear, people joined the FaceBook page in attempt to be heard by a college that was keeping us in dark about their upcoming plans. As a result, Georgetown finally started addressing some of our concerns. The sole purpose of the FB page was to give our children the same opportunity that students all over the country are getting safely. COVID is everywhere. Why should anyone assume that Georgetown students are any safer at home when their siblings are going to local schools, playing sports and parents are going to work. This country is polarized enough and now I’m starting to feel like the Georgetown community is also being polarized. It’s bad enough that our isolated freshman are being so mentally challenged and are probably clinically depressed at this point. Articles that suggest they should not be welcomed to campus by upperclassmen shows a lack of compassion and only makes them feel more unwanted by the Georgetown community.

    Reply